RE: [Heartlogic-dev] new idea

[William L. Jarrold]

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:

> Anyhow, I don't anticipate that there is much more code to write to go
> live with our current plan.  As soon as we can get these initial studies
> designed and underway then we can go off on other tangents.

right.  so what is there to design for the things i was talking about.

e.g. we want a browser pane that looks like this...

Dear Open Heart Logic user.  As part of _The Turing Challenge_ we
would love it if you would rate the following assertion in terms of
its believability...

"Vienna is wet."

(1) V.Unbeliveable
(2) Unbelievable
(3) Nuetral
(4) Believable
(5) V Believable

...right this is a trivial change from what you have done so far.  Can't 
you just put it up lickety split?

e.g. put it up, i'll take a quick look at it.  we can do it anonymous let 
it sit for 5 days and see if people fill it out...to hell with my prior 
anality.  we'll want to be more anal when we wanna do a replication.

Maybe you are wanting me to look at some older emails of yours relating to
a hot or not type study that you were proposing?  Josh replied and y'all
went back and forth but i have not yet read those messages.  trying to 
focus (-;

Bill

> --
> If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
> (Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)