heartlogic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Heartlogic-dev] human emotion


From: Joshua N Pritikin
Subject: [Heartlogic-dev] human emotion
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 10:21:12 +0530

Tomasello argues that the key ontogenetic addition which distinguishes
humans from other primates is the ability of individuals to understand
conspecifics as beings like themselves who have intentional and mental
lives like their own. (The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, p5)

With this in mind, I took another look at Sanders 1989.  Which
emotions require an intentional understanding of other agents and
which do not?  In other words, which emotions could conceivably be
experienced by apes and which are uniquely human emotions?

Sanders identifies six emotions: anger, gratitude, approval,
disapproval, guilt, and shame (p7).  I look at each in turn.

* Guilt -- You feel guilty if you believe that you have done something
that you think is wrong, and you believe that you knew it was wrong at
the time you did it.

There is no mention of other agents in the definition of guilt.  To
feel guilt, there is no need to understand other agents as
intentional.  Hence, ape can likely feel guilt.

* Approval -- You approve of someone if you believe that they have
done something they should.

* Disapproval - You disapprove of someone if you believe that they
have done something they shouldn't.

As written, these definitions can be understood in a Behaviorist
sense.  The concern is not _why_ someone has done something they
should or shouldn't.  The focus in on the behavior only.  Hence, apes
can likely feel approval and disapproval.

As an example for approval, Sanders offers "Barney knew that Jack had
donated groceries to a charity."  An ape would approve, but a human
might ask why Jack made the donation.  Has Jack made his fortune by
marketing cigarettes and alcohol?  A human can understand the larger
situation and, perhaps, have a more appropriate reaction.

As as example for disapproval, Sanders offers "Jack stole a candy bar
from the supermarket.  Betty saw him."  An ape would disapprove, but a
human might ask why Jack stole the candy.  What if Jack was the only
son of the owner of the shop and Betty knew it?

* Gratitude -- You are grateful to someone if you think they did
something that you wanted them to do that benefited you, and their
action was not conditioned on receiving anything in return.

The only difficulty here, for an ape, is the clause about the action
not being conditional on something in return.  This difficulty is
easily overcome. An ape can presumably feel gratitude simply by
assuming, without any special justification, that nothing is expected
in return.

* Anger -- You become angry at someone if you think they did something
wrong, you didn't want them to do it, and you think they knew it was
wrong.

Only one clause poses any difficulty for an ape.  To get angry, an ape
must believe that the other conspecific knews that what he/she was
doing was wrong.  Similar to Gratitude, no special justification is
needed to support this belief.

As an example of anger, Sanders offers "Jack went to the supermarket.
He parked his car in a legal parking place. When he came out, it was
gone."  An ape would be angry, but a human might want to know why
someone took his car.  What if Jack's friend had stolen Jack's car
because it was urgently need to take Jack's mother to the hospital?  A
human version of anger could be more cautious about weighing the
motives of the alleged thief.

* Shame -- You feel ashamed if you believe that you have done
something that someone else thinks is wrong, you think they know what
you've done, and you care what they think.

It is necessarily a human goal to want someone else not to disapprove
of you.  An ape cannot hold such a goal because apes do not understand
conspecifics as mental beings.  Hence, shame is a human emotion.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]