[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Heartlogic-dev] Kwiki wiki page HomePage updated by AnonymousGnome
From: |
wiki |
Subject: |
[Heartlogic-dev] Kwiki wiki page HomePage updated by AnonymousGnome |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2005 08:44:17 UT |
Kwiki page HomePage edited by AnonymousGnome
--- database/HomePage.old Wed May 25 14:14:17 2005
+++ database/HomePage Wed May 25 14:14:17 2005
@@ -75,25 +75,20 @@
What word to use in surveys?
What independent variable do we test?
-Believable Correct Interesting Surprsing
+Believable vs Correct vs Interesting vs Surprsing
-Completely Incorrect/Believable
-Slighly Incorrect/Believable
-Neutral
-Slightly Correct/Believable
-Completely Correct/Believable
+* Completely Incorrect/Believable
+* Slighly Incorrect/Believable
+* Neutral
+* Slightly Correct/Believable
+* Completely Correct/Believable
What is the difference between believability and correctness?
-The below is Joshua's example and I find it confusing. E.g. what does
-"stats are positive" mean? But if I've understood his basic point
-correctly, I agree with that point.
-
-For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story. The stats are
-positive for Jack/Goal with Jill/Goal and Jill/NoGoal. Why not
+For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story. Why not
Jack/NoGoal with Jill/Goal? Since the story doesn't specify the
individual goals, I don't think there is a correct answer but there
are believable answers. Hence, I am inclined to leave the rating as a
-believability rating. Or am I missing something?
+believability rating.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;