heartlogic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Heartlogic-dev] Kwiki wiki page HomePage updated by AnonymousGnome


From: wiki
Subject: [Heartlogic-dev] Kwiki wiki page HomePage updated by AnonymousGnome
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:44:17 UT

Kwiki page HomePage edited by AnonymousGnome

--- database/HomePage.old       Wed May 25 14:14:17 2005
+++ database/HomePage   Wed May 25 14:14:17 2005
@@ -75,25 +75,20 @@
 What word to use in surveys?
 What independent variable do we test?
 
-Believable Correct Interesting Surprsing
+Believable vs Correct vs Interesting vs Surprsing
 
-Completely Incorrect/Believable
-Slighly Incorrect/Believable
-Neutral
-Slightly Correct/Believable
-Completely Correct/Believable
+* Completely Incorrect/Believable
+* Slighly Incorrect/Believable
+* Neutral
+* Slightly Correct/Believable
+* Completely Correct/Believable
 
 What is the difference between believability and correctness?
 
-The below is Joshua's example and I find it confusing.  E.g. what does
-"stats are positive" mean?  But if I've understood his basic point
-correctly, I agree with that point.
-
-For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story.  The stats are
-positive for Jack/Goal with Jill/Goal and Jill/NoGoal.  Why not
+For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story.  Why not
 Jack/NoGoal with Jill/Goal?  Since the story doesn't specify the
 individual goals, I don't think there is a correct answer but there
 are believable answers.  Hence, I am inclined to leave the rating as a
-believability rating.  Or am I missing something?
+believability rating.
 
 
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]