Re: %union with STL

[Hans Aberg]

On 26 May 2009, at 22:38, Luca wrote:

> > Checking what the compiler accepts is a good way to produce non- 
> > standard source code
> using a pointer inside a union is a good way to produce non-standard  
> source code?!?

So what does the C++ standard say about it?

> > - and you do not say what compiler you used.
> g++ and Visual Studio. I think it is enough...

Hard to know before you reported it.

> > But in the end, I think the OP problem might be due to an older  
> > version of Bison or an instantiation problem - lack of declaration  
> > or a problem with the compiler.
> Simply some #include is missing...

Did you see the post by Vincent?

  Hans