[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Syslog facility (Side Note)
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Syslog facility (Side Note) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:55:55 +0200 (MEST) |
On 29 Sep, Chip Seraphine wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused by this. What "support"? It's a syslogd
> replacement-- using it is no different than using any other syslog
> daemon implementation. The difference is in what it does after it
> receives information via syslog(3). Using syslogd or msyslogd or
> mod-syslogd or syslog-ng should have no bearing whatsoever on the
> application generating the messages (cfengine).
>
> Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no wrote:
>> Is this a commercial product? That would make it rather
>> inapplicable. But if it were easy to support as an alternative, I'd
>> be willing.
>>
>> M
>>
This all seems to have been a red herring. If it is a drop-in
replacement then there is no issue.
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Re: Syslog facility, (continued)
- Re: Syslog facility, Jeff Wasilko, 2003/09/26
- Re: Syslog facility, Chip Seraphine, 2003/09/26
- Re: Syslog facility, John Sechrest, 2003/09/26
- Re: Syslog facility, Chip Seraphine, 2003/09/26
- RE: Syslog facility (Side Note), Wayne Sweatt, 2003/09/27
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note), Mark . Burgess, 2003/09/27
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note), warren, 2003/09/27
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note), Systems Administrator, 2003/09/28
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note), Andrew Stribblehill, 2003/09/29
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note), Chip Seraphine, 2003/09/29
- Re: Syslog facility (Side Note),
Mark Burgess <=
Re: Syslog facility, Frank Smith, 2003/09/26