[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?
From: |
Robert Praetorius |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:02:19 +1100 |
> It's seems that the OP is not familiar with GNU's definition.
The OP is familiar with the FSF's definition of free and was just being
spacy.
However, the OP is a pluralist & sez: let a 1000 definitions of free bloom.
Also the
OP has been using Emacs since it was written in TECO (and ^R mode before that,
'cuz we
didn't have enough core) and although his mind thinks of it as free, his
fingers are
somewhat enslaved to the key bindings.
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
I concur that it woulda been good for this URL to appear earlier in the
conversation.
- Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, (continued)
- Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Paul Kinnucan, 2001/12/20
- Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Galen Boyer, 2001/12/20
- Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Heribert Maier, 2001/12/20
- Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Galen Boyer, 2001/12/21
[h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Jason Rumney, 2001/12/18
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Paul Whitfield, 2001/12/18
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Heribert Maier, 2001/12/18
RE: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Jeremy Bowen, 2001/12/19
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Jeremy Bowen, 2001/12/20
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Peter Davis, 2001/12/20