Re: no `long long' type in C++

[W. L. Estes]

On Saturday, 12 October 2002,18:30 +0200, Andreas.P.Priesnitz wrote:

> When compiling a lex.yy.cc generated by flex 2.5.22 (using
> FLEX_NEED_INTEGRAL_TYPE_DEFINITIONS !), I get warnings for the C-standard, but
> non-C++-standard types "long long" and "unsigned long long" being used.
> 
> It is just a warning, so not a problem, but it seems (sorry, i've NO clue
> about the flex internals) to be fixed by this patch to flexint.h (and
> re-generating `skel.c'/`scan.c'?):

You're on a 64-bit machine and your c++ compiler  doesn't define
64-bit integer types? Odd. I'll have to ask around about the c++
standards and such. In future, please submit context or unified
diffs. they're much more helpful and they're easier to read.

Thanks,

--Will