[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: help system question
From: |
Robert Thorpe |
Subject: |
Re: help system question |
Date: |
3 Jan 2007 03:25:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: "Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com>
> > That doesn't indicate that the official v22.1 should be
> > significantly more bug tested than 22.0.NN ones were.
>
> Who said it's significantly more bug-free? As someone who
> participates in Emacs pretests since v19.30, I cannot in good faith
> say that the official version is so much more stable than the pretest
> one.
I see. In that case v22.1 is a reasonable version number to use.
I mentioned this because often projects write great extra features but
their users only find out years/months later when they upgrade to
another new version. This is because the authors have only incremented
the version number by a small amount the first time, so users don't
notice. That doesn't sound like what's happening here though.