[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functi
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ? |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jan 2011 08:50:10 -0800 |
> yeah I guess the LOOP macro is where I got stuck in doing Lisp.
The `loop' macro is scarcely Lisp ;-). Its syntax is certainly is not very
representative of Lisp's syntax, which is apparently the bugaboo of this thread.
`loop' is to Lisp as `find' is to a UNIX/GNU/Linux shell. `loop' and `find' are
each practically a language unto itself. Each can be useful ... and daunting to
the uninitiated.
If you learn the language of `loop' you might (or might not) like it, but not
liking the language of `loop' has little relation to not liking the language of
Lisp. ;-)
Some might appreciate this:
http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/doc/index.html#Top
or the short version:
http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/doc/Don_0027t-Loop-Iterate.html#Don_0027t
-Loop-Iterate
No flames from the Loopite Liberation Legion, if you please. ;-)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- RE: How to improve the readability of (any) LISP or any highlevel functional language to the level of FORTH ?,
Drew Adams <=