[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hash strangeness
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: hash strangeness |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Nov 2014 20:48:08 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Pascal J. Bourguignon <pjb <at> informatimago.com> writes:
>
> In the current emacs lisp, there's no point in using symbol-name strings
> as key in the hash-table: just use symbols with eql as test.
> Notice that in emacs lisp:
>
Of course. The original code transforms the symbol names and
uses these transformed strings as keys in the hash, so it is
a remnant of simplifying that code into this simple example.
- Re: hash strangeness, (continued)
- Re: hash strangeness, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/11/02
- Message not available
- Re: hash strangeness, Barry Margolin, 2014/11/02
- Re: hash strangeness, Tom, 2014/11/03
- Re: hash strangeness, Robert Thorpe, 2014/11/03
- Re: hash strangeness, Michael Heerdegen, 2014/11/03
- RE: hash strangeness, Drew Adams, 2014/11/03
- Re: hash strangeness, Marcin Borkowski, 2014/11/04
Re: hash strangeness, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2014/11/02
- Re: hash strangeness,
Tom <=