Re: 64 bit official Windows builds

[Sam Halliday]

On Friday, 8 January 2016 09:12:20 UTC, Eli Zaretskii  wrote:
> No, this compromise contradicts the GPL.  The sources must be
> available from the same place as the binaries


Are you sure about this? My understanding is that source code is to be provided 
if it is requested:

  http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid


I believe a GNU Emacs 64bit Windows download should be self-contained and 
include all runtime DLLs that are necessary for it to run.