[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnucap] Cross compiling
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnucap] Cross compiling |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:54:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 29 January 2013, address@hidden wrote:
> I had to make some changes to the source code (adding few
> #include <ctime> for instance)
> and some other changes to the Make2.mingw32 to make it work.
Thanks .... some headers are included by other headers on some
systems.
> I'm going to document how i did this for a "personal" use.
> Would you like me to send this back to you so you can
> consider what i had to do for a future change ?
> Or should i make a wiki page about how I cross compiled it ?
It will change with the next release, which splits out libraries
and plugins. Yes .. I need your help.
> I was using a version of gnucap I don't know anything about
> (compilation wise). I just happened to have the .exe file
> (GNUCAP 2009.12.07 RCS 26.136).
>
> tran time : 1.83
>
> status says :
>
> queue : 0.01
> lu : 1.67
> back : 0.05
> output : 0.05
> overhead : 0.05
>
> others are at 0
This is running on a PC with MS-windows????
>
> ####################
>
> So now I'm using my cross-compiled version (GNUCAP 2009.12.07
> RCS 26.136) (anyhow i still have the same result, even using
> the native gnucap launcher on linux or gnucap.exe in wine or
> a version I compiled directly into windows.)
> total time : 7.76
>
> status says :
>
> lu = 1.54
> output = 3.63
> overhead = 2.53
This is running on wine????
The difference in lu is probably just differences in
optimization or CPU.
The others .. I/O ... probably you are seeing wine overhead,
which apparently is included in those times.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Help-gnucap] Cross compiling,
al davis <=