[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual func
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function? |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Sep 2006 21:45:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
"Dev1024" <lmemmott@yahoo.com> writes:
> A sincere thanks for your response and clarification.
Please do not top-post.
> In response to
> why, yes, I have cases where g++ code will call MSVC code (or vice
> versa). Currently, as explained below, it doesn't work due to the this
> pointer on the stack.
If you ever get past this obstacle, it will start *not* working for
other reasons, such as different object layout and different
name-mangling scheme. Your attempt is futile: C++ code compiled by
different compilers is *not* (and generally can't be made)
link-compatible.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.
- What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/23
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/09/23
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/24
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?,
Paul Pluzhnikov <=
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/25
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/09/25
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/25
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/25
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Dev1024, 2006/09/27
- Re: What should the call stack look like when calling a C++ virtual function?, Paul Pluzhnikov, 2006/09/28