[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 0^0 = ?
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
RE: 0^0 = ? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:36:14 -0600 (CST) |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 14-Nov-2003, (Ted Harding) <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> | Clearly, 0^0 is mathematically indeterminate.
> |
> | [...]
> |
> | I don't think we'll ever get them to agree!
>
> Then I think it would probably be best to try to conform to the
> standards of other languages (hoping that there is some uniformity in
> their behavior).
Octave is currently returning 0^0 = 1, right? Maybe we should keep it
that way or risk having many scripts/functions fail to work properly. It
is certainly a reasonable value. This thread started when someone stated
that he would like 0^0 to equal 1 in his code.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: 0^0 = ?, (continued)
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Randy Gober, 2003/11/13
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Boud Roukema, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, John W. Eaton, 2003/11/14
- Re: 0^0 = ?, Geraint Paul Bevan, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Ted Harding, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, John W. Eaton, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?,
Mike Miller <=