Re: new octave

[Shai Ayal]

hugo1981 (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a "new octave" program with many differences from Matlab/Octave
> syntax.

Do you mean you are writing another interpreter which is neither matlab 
not octave?

> Matlab uses three dots (...) to tell to continue the command on the next
> line. I would like to know your opinion about other solution than the three
> dots (...).
> Below is an example of a m file with three options. Tell me which one you
> like more, or tell me about any better idea.

The first two are supported by octave. I like the second one best 
because it is more inline with the unix way of doing things (e.g. shell, 
tcl, ...)


> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> function res=myFunc(src)
>
> %option 1 (like matlab)
> filter= ...
> [ ...
> -100,200,-100 ...
> ]
>
> % option 2 (like tcl)
> filter= \
> [ \
> -100,200,-100 \
> ] 
>
> % option 3 (using {})
> {
> filter=
> [
> -100,200,-100
> ]
> }
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Best regards,
> Hugo
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/new-octave-t1217097.html#a3219146
> Sent from the Octave - General forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------