[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ARPACK vs (BLAS + LAPACK) - build question
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: ARPACK vs (BLAS + LAPACK) - build question |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:18:07 -0800 (PST) |
--- On Sun, 11/15/09, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>
> Subject: ARPACK vs (BLAS + LAPACK) - build question
> To: address@hidden
> Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 5:10 PM
> Hello All,
>
> ARPACK README file says:
>
> "
> The makefile is set up to build a
> self-contained library which includes
> the needed BLAS 1/2/3 and LAPACK
> routines. If you already have the
> BLAS and LAPACK libraries installed on
> your system you might want to
> change the definition of DIRS as
> indicated in the ARmake.inc file.
> ".
>
> So, when building ARPACK for Octave how do you guys build
> it - using
> the included into ARPACK BLAS + LAPACK routines or using
> independently
> built BLAS + LAPACK ?
>
> I build BLAS + LAPACK regardless; disk space is not an
> issue, i.e. if
> the chances athat ARPACK will function more correctly with
> included into
> the tarball BLAS + LAPACK routines are better, so be it.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei.
>
Bump.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: ARPACK vs (BLAS + LAPACK) - build question,
Sergei Steshenko <=