help-zile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[zile-devel] [ zile-Feature Requests-1088405 ] Use buffer-oriented rathe


From: SourceForge.net
Subject: [zile-devel] [ zile-Feature Requests-1088405 ] Use buffer-oriented rather than line-oriented structures
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:02:46 -0700

Feature Requests item #1088405, was opened at 2004-12-20 13:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rrt
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=367089&aid=1088405&group_id=17089

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Private: No
Submitted By: Reuben Thomas (rrt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Use buffer-oriented rather than line-oriented structures

Initial Comment:
See the code to understand what this means.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Reuben Thomas (rrt)
Date: 2007-07-28 14:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=50145
Originator: YES

One way would be to port the rblist-based buffer code from Zee.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Reuben Thomas (rrt)
Date: 2005-02-06 08:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=50145

Reopen. There's nothing wrong with keeping programming goals in the 
tracker!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Reuben Thomas (rrt)
Date: 2005-02-06 08:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=50145

If this is a good idea, it will eventually happen. Idea: use qEmacs's 
data structures, which are allegedly good.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=367089&aid=1088405&group_id=17089



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]