Re: [igraph] Better layout output in igraph

[Víctor Pascual Cid]

Now that you point out this fact... is there any comparison between the 
performance of Gephi vs R laying out graphs?

Víctor

On Aug 21, 2011, at 14:46 , Håvard Wahl Kongsgård wrote:

> The "autocurve" function would be really useful for creating better
> looking graphs. Currently gephi will produce much better looking
> graphs than igraph, however it's very slow on large graphs.
> 
> -Håvard
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Tamas Nepusz <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hi, have you now added support for curved edges to the trunk?
>> Actually, I've just commited a patch which adds support for curved edges in
>> the Python interface. You can use the edge_curved=... keyword argument or
>> the "curved" edge attribute. Positive numbers correspond to edges curved in
>> CCW direction, negative numbers correspond to CW curves, zero represents a
>> straight line. True means 0.5, False means 0, just like in the R interface.
>> 
>> I'm also planning to add an "autocurve" function which automatically assigns
>> a curvature value to multiple edges but keeps single edges straight, but I'm
>> not sure what is the best way to do that. Maybe I'll add a separate function
>> called autocurve() which takes a graph and adds the appropriate "curved"
>> edge attribute.
>> 
>> --
>> T.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> igraph-help mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igraph-help mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help