[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:17:05 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:57:47 -0800 Frank Fredstone <none@not.no> wrote:
FF> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> Run emacs -q and load this:
>>
>> (require 'gnus)
>> ;; untested primary select method, should work though
>> (setq gnus-select-method '(nnnil "nothing"))
>>
>> (setq mail-sources nil
>> gnus-secondary-select-methods '((nnml "mail"
>> (nnml-get-new-mail nil)
>> ;; should not be necessary but just in case...
>> (nnmail-get-new-mail nil))))
>>
>> Does your inbox still get emptied? What's in *Messages*?
FF> Thanks. No, it is not emptied. Messages contains:
OK, excellent. So there's something not in this configuration but in
yours that triggers the emptying. This is your configuration:
(require 'gnus)
(setq gnus-select-method '(nntp "news.evilmegacorp.com"))
(setq mail-sources nil
gnus-secondary-select-methods
'((nnml "mail")
(nnimap "asdf"
(nnimap-address "localhost")
(nnimap-server-port 143)
(nnimap-stream network))))
Can you try emacs -q and see if your configuration as stated above
empties your inbox?
If it does, there's three differences:
A) nnml-get-new-mail and nnmail-get-new-mail
B) the secondary nnimap server
C) the primary nntp server
You then need to figure out which things (it could be one or more of A,
B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC) are triggering your issue.
Ted
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, (continued)
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Kendall Shaw, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/09
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/13
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/13
- better bug reporting (was: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/14
- Re: better bug reporting, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/14