[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:57:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Sivaram writes:
> Right, what's the difference between * and ! then? I was told to use
> * a few years back. I believe I mentioned that I wanted to keep the
> article around indefinitely
* stores a copy of the article on your local machine (article caching).
! makes the article show in the group, even though it is read (ticking).
See: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_37.html
So if you are reading articles on a news server with a short retention
time, you probably want to use both.
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Your problem is you've got no common sense." Adam Sjøgren
"I've got PLENTY of common sense! asjo@koldfront.dk
I just choose to ignore it."
- retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Enrico Schumann, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Enrico Schumann, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric S Fraga, 2017/02/28
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/27