[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?
From: |
Enrico Schumann |
Subject: |
Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:12:58 +0100 |
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 26 2017,Enrico Schumann wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Adam Sjøgren writes:
>>
>> [snipped 20 lines]
>>
>>> When 'gnus-use-cache' is t, ticking (!) will also copy the
>>> article to the cache. See http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_42.html .
>>>
>>
>> if it's set to t (gnus-use-cache), won't all articles be cached? I
>> only want to do this for interesting articles
>
> Its default value, the symbol 'passive, should do what you want: only
> cache articles when you tell it to, with * or !.
Hm, I've just tested this, and with gnus-use-cache set
to 'passive, Gnus does *not* cache articles that I tick
with '!'. It may well be, as always, that I have
something in my .gnus.el that prevents this :-) But it
is also in line with the docs
(http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_42.html):
,----
| To turn caching on, set gnus-use-cache to t. By
| default, all articles ticked or marked as dormant
| will then be copied over to your local cache
| (gnus-cache-directory).
`----
So only 'articles ticked or marked as dormant' are
copied to the cache, not all articles.
--
Enrico Schumann
Lucerne, Switzerland
http://enricoschumann.net
- retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Adam Sjøgren, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Enrico Schumann, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/26
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?,
Enrico Schumann <=
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Eric S Fraga, 2017/02/28
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer, 2017/02/27
- Re: retaining marked articles in summary buffer?, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2017/02/27