Re: [Koha-devel] move to savannah

[MJ Ray]

Thomas D <address@hidden>
> [...] While the relatively small community of active Koha
> developers could learn to use a better tool than CVS, whatever that better
> choice might be, it would restrict the size of the development community to
> those who know or are willing to learn to use the superior software version
> control system. [...]

I agree with this conservative approach. It's not at all clear
which system will "win" yet, but I agree with another poster
that git looks like the best bet at the low level for now.

Command compatibility isn't the whole story. There are other
levels of compatibility and other problems (like svn's size
increase and poor licence) which will need to be addressed. That
is why I think git is looking good: there seems to be enough
diversity developing that everyone will find something to
please them.

Being able to interoperate with a "mainline" copy in CVS will
probably be a big feature of a winning tool, because CVS is on a
*lot* of systems out there. Many of the next-gen' source control
authors hate the idea, because CVS has such basic problems,
but I think it will be needed...

The only thing more basic, in my opinion, is to be able to
produce tarballs and patches easily (as tar and patch are even
more widespread), so people without any version control can
still follow development easily, but koha doesn't do that today.

For now, we keep watching and trying out in the background.
I agree that mainline should stay in CVS.

Best wishes,
-- 
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/  irc.oftc.net/slef  Jabber/SIP ask