[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: physmem, simple containers
From: |
Stefan Götz |
Subject: |
Re: physmem, simple containers |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:06:00 +1100 |
> This entails that physmem needs to map in all physical memory
> into its virtual address space. It's just most convenient to do this 1:1
> for two reasons.
There are at least two scenarios where this is not possible. First, it
won't be too long before people stick more than 3 GB of RAM into their
32-bit machines. Second, PCI devices can map their control registers
into 'physical' memory space at addresses above 3 GB (e.g. my network
adapter). It's not a problem to request this memory from sigma0 but you
obviously can't map it 1:1 (but maybe you do not intend to manage this
memory with physmem anyway).
Stefan
- Re: physmem, simple containers, (continued)
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Johan Rydberg, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Niels Möller, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Niels Möller, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Niels Möller, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Johan Rydberg, 2004/01/27
- Re: physmem, simple containers, Niels Möller, 2004/01/27
Re: physmem, simple containers,
Stefan Götz <=