Re: On Compatibility

l4-hurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On Compatibility

From:	Alfred M\. Szmidt
Subject:	Re: On Compatibility
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:40:39 +0200

   The many replies to his messages are making these discussions a
   waste of time to read.

So don't read it, just don't dictate what people should do with honest
and good criticism.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

RE: On Compatibility, (continued)
- RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
    - Re: On Compatibility, Michal Suchanek, 2005/10/26
- Re: On Compatibility, Jonathan Shapiro, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- Re: On Compatibility, Jonathan Shapiro, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
    - Re: On Compatibility, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/25
    - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, David Hazel, 2005/10/25
    - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
- RE: On Compatibility, Christopher Nelson, 2005/10/25
  - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25
    - Re: On Compatibility, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/25

Prev by Date: Re: On Compatibility
Next by Date: Supporting POSIX *users* (was: Re: Does supporting POSIX applications require ACLs?)
Previous by thread: Re: On Compatibility
Next by thread: RE: On Compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread