[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: performance or anything that can replace it.
|
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: performance or anything that can replace it. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:45:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060403) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
MT Rezaie wrote:
> In my last question of "is there any performance comparison between L4
> vs. coyotos?", I meant that there must be some thing in coyotos future
> that was not in L4 future and what is it?
why didn't you ask exactly this? ;)
the short answer is thet l4/pistachio does not provide the right
primitives for implementing the object capability os we are trying to build.
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFES+d6vD/ijq9JWhsRAl4KAJ4jGFR5hH1ShCzXMoNTMFBLTk4dzwCfRwbu
pwJzMfIjifaug8uMjFWmoCg=
=jFkj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----