[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:51:06 -0400 |
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 22:09 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I don't know. Maybe I just feel uneasy about programs blocking on an
> event that semantically can not occur anymore, and no process can be
> identified in the system to blame it for that. I like call semantics.
Understandable. But in a scheduler activation system the process is not
blocked!!
shap
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, (continued)
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/29
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/30
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/30
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Tom Bachmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Tom Bachmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/29
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/29
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/29
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/30
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/30
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/30
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Tom Bachmann, 2006/04/23