[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
Bas Wijnen |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Wed, 3 May 2006 14:31:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:29:02AM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Scribit address@hidden dies 02/05/2006 hora 23:36:
> > AFAIK mutt only looks at the addresses when doing list-reply, not how
> > the mails arrived. So it shouldn't matter whether you reply to the
> > list copy or the CC.
>
> How could mutt guess that an address is a mailing list? It does know how
> to reply to the list because there are List-* headers. Which are
> obviously not in the mail I received in CC.
Mutt doesn't guess this, it knows it because it's in the config file. You
specify lists <regexp> for lists which you are not subscribed to, and
subscribe <regexp> for lists that you are subscribed to.
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/01
- Re: No need for CC, please, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please,
Bas Wijnen <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/13
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02