[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative network stack design
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
Subject: |
Re: Alternative network stack design |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:50:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061231) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Brinkmann schrieb:
> The decision which processes can access a tagged resource with extra
> privileges would be made by the processes doing the tagging according
> to its security policy.
How is that different from a design where every process can hand out
intransparent memory (that is, memory the process can only reclaim, not
inspect)? Wouldn't your design introduce all the harmful properties it
tries to abolish in the first place?
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFolpFvD/ijq9JWhsRAsSHAJ9bifmdJus2yLY68OE7SXF8ubzsbACfX9EK
l55rXsWQyEMhxc+TkgORHqw=
=Y/Fk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Opaque storage, (continued)
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Alan Grimes, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Anton Tagunov, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/11
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: Alternative network stack design,
Tom Bachmann <=
- Re: Alternative network stack design (was: Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/07
Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/01/15