[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opaque storage
From: |
Anton Tagunov |
Subject: |
Re: Opaque storage |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:12:03 +0300 |
Marcus> This "destined to S" in your proposal appears to be exactly the
Marcus> tagging that I proposed. Don't you think so?
Pierre> No tagging takes place in my scenario. Instead, only the graph of
Pierre> capabilities dictate who is able to use the opaque storage capability.
I think I'm getting what the talk is about -
how does A decide if it can trust S?
Anton
P.S. trust = allow to use A's storage in an opaque fashion
- Re: Alternative network stack design (was: Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack, (continued)
- Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/09
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/09
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/09
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Alan Grimes, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage,
Anton Tagunov <=
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/10
- Re: Opaque storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/11
- Re: Opaque storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/11
- Re: Alternative network stack design, Tom Bachmann, 2007/01/08
- Re: Alternative network stack design (was: Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/07
Re: Potential use case for opaque space bank: domain factored network stack, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/01/15