libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 330-gary-ltdl-vs-need-lib-prefix-unknown


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Re: 330-gary-ltdl-vs-need-lib-prefix-unknown
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:12:32 -0400

Hallo Ralf,

On Jun 23, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 07:30:22PM CEST:

May I humbly suggest that we go back to our older (faster) way
of working where 72 hours after submission, it's okay to commit unless
someone raises a concern... at which point we can resort to the
meticulous review process.  WDYT?

I don't think we've ever actually decided to go away from this rule,
except that I have asked explicitly for more time on some (specific)
patches (which I agree has caused much delay already).  So feel free
to go by this rule as you like.

Would you like me to hold off on applying 330 until you've had time
to finish the review?

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden
  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912




Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]