[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:32:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On 8/16/2010 5:07 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Charles Wilson wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:50:21PM CEST:
>> On 8/16/2010 4:42 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you run
>>> VERBOSE=yes $srcdir/tests/fcdemo-conf.test; echo $?
>>>
>>> and post the output of that? VERBOSE=debug is even more informative, if
>>> that is necessary. Thanks.
>>
>> Attached.
>
> Thanks. The test exits 1:
>
> [...]
> | -rw-r--r-- 1 cwilson cwilson 2071 Aug 15 19:29 config-h.in
> | -rw-r--r-- 1 cwilson cwilson 27264 Aug 15 19:29 Makefile.in
> | 1
>
> That should show up as FAIL in the output. I have no idea why that
> happens.
Well, in the top level Makefile.am:
if HAVE_F77
TESTS += $(F77_TESTS)
endif
if HAVE_FC
TESTS += $(FC_TESTS)
endif
Since HAVE_F77 and HAVE_FC are not true, 'make check-TESTS' doesn't even
attempt to run the the corresponding tests. So, that explains what I
was seeing; I'm just not used to that effect.
The odd result is that check-TESTS assumes that the total number of
tests is equal to the number of terms listed in $TESTS. Any tests that
are not included in that list -- like $(F77_TESTS) or $(FC_TESTS) if you
don't have fortran -- are treated as if they do not exist, which is
different that explicitly "SKIPping" them.
But...this is a long-standing design issue with the old test suite.
Sorry for the noise.
> Which Automake version do you use? I'm not aware of any problems with
> the TESTS driver of it, and I've run its testsuite on Cygwin not too
> long ago too.
No, it was all a false alarm. But I'm using am-1.11.1.
--
Chuck
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches, Charles Wilson, 2010/08/16
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches, Charles Wilson, 2010/08/21
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/22
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches, Charles Wilson, 2010/08/16
Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sysroot followup patches, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/22