[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] ambitus engraver
From: |
Han-Wen |
Subject: |
[PATCH] ambitus engraver |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:48:44 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
>
> BTW., to solve the time signature problems, I still would like to
> extend the \time syntax. However, since my original proposal was
> considered being too over-engineered (and anyway would take too much time
> for 1.6), I would like to implement a small solution, adding syntax of the
> form "\time n[a:b]/d" (as an optional extension of the current form "\time
> n/d") just to be able to address shapes "C" and "O" including their
> slashed and dotted variants. Would that be ok?
Call me lazy and apathic (I have a nice glass of whiskey here :), but
I forgot the gist of this \time syntax. Can you give me a quick
rundown again?
> Juergen
> diff -Naur lilypond-1.5.63/ChangeLog lilypond-1.5.63.NEW/ChangeLog
> --- lilypond-1.5.63/ChangeLog Mon Jun 24 01:26:22 2002
> +++ lilypond-1.5.63.NEW/ChangeLog Tue Jun 25 22:24:35 2002
thanks for the patch. It's in CVS now.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Juergen Reuter, 2002/06/25
- [PATCH] ambitus engraver,
Han-Wen <=
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Juergen Reuter, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Mats Bengtsson, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Juergen Reuter, 2002/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] ambitus engraver, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/26