[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: #{ $music #}
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: #{ $music #} |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 10:31:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Fri, 14 May 2004 09:03:33 +0200, Han-Wen a dit :
> address@hidden writes:
>> +LY_DEFINE (ly_clone_parser, "ly:clone-parser",
>> + 1, 0, 0,
>> + (SCM parser_smob),
>> + "Return a clone of PARSER_SMOB.")
>> +{
>> + My_lily_parser *parser = unsmob_my_lily_parser (parser_smob);
>> + My_lily_parser *clone = new My_lily_parser (*parser);
>> + return clone->self_scm ();
>> +}
> nitpick: you should do
> return scm_gc_unprotect_object (clone->self_scm ());
OK. I've seen several occurences of this pattern in the source code,
but wasn't sure of what it meant, for I didn't find the definition of
scm_gc_unprotect_object in the guile reference manual. Does it means
that the object is made garbage-collectable? (for an unknown reason my
first intuition was the opposite.)
nicolas