[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question regaring editor / debugger idea
From: |
Heikki Johannes Junes |
Subject: |
Re: Question regaring editor / debugger idea |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2004 21:59:07 +0300 (EEST) |
User-agent: |
HUT webmail, IMP 2.2.6 |
On Fri, 14 May 2004 13:38:07 -0400 David Brandon <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've started on a language reference. You can take a look at what I've
>
> got so far. See attached. It's not much but it's a start. Also, look
>
> in the files in /usr/local/share/lilypond/<version>/ly (or as
> appropriate for your system). A lot of stuff is in there.
>
> David
>
>
Some comments:
"no octave mark indicates the octave below middle c"
Isn't c' middle c?
The following is mark is enough for the moment .. I am repeating myself, but the
indication of version is the additional value what the manual provides:
Introduced in version x.
There was introduced postfix syntax at some point in the developement (since
major release 2.0.0). Therefore, slurs, accidentals, etc. are attached to a note
using a postfix syntax:
@code{note1 ~ note2}
Produces a tie between notes1 and note2.
The syntax above is "note1-~ note2", although it may be written as above. In
other words, '~' has no meaning without a preceding note to which it is attached
as a postfixer and without a following note that is of the same pitch.
In other words, maybe it should be indicated that '~' is a note_modifier, as you
indicate earlier:
@address@hidden@address@hidden
Greetings,
Heikki Junes