Re: When C++, and when scheme

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> >> seperating out things which are common between Grobs and Snobs into a
> >> base object (Probs - property objects).  The first major hurdle I have
> >> hit is that of interfaces.  I am having difficulty deciding whether
> >> interfaces should be the domain of grobs only, whether there should be
> >> a seperate set for snobs, or whether a single unified set should
> >> suffice for both.  Would you have any insights into this question?
> >
> > I'd refrain from trying to be too generic when it's not clear that you
> > will need it. Don't put in interfaces, and once you really need them,
> > let them bubble up from the Grob class.
> 
> Sounds good.  So for the meantime, I am running without interfaces.  I
> do have one more question.  I am also running without Object_keys for
> now, as I have not yet been able to determine for what purpose they
> are used.  Is there a good reason to include these?

No. We can hack them in if necessary. Object_keys is
highly-experimental stuff for a yet-to-build graphical tweak editor.


-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen