Re: LSR issues [Manual authors please read]

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 00:28 +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> 
> > The reason for my remark was pure prejudice. The website looks a bit 
> > hi-tech, 
> > and it happens (too) often that hi-tech-looking pages use bad html. When 
> > someone reported that it didn't work, I just did a quick w3c check.
> 
> Well, no one ever told me a site of mine looks hi-tech... I'll take that
> as a big complimente 8^).
> 
> > IMHO, there is a big point in using PD for LSR: Many snippets may be 
> > directly 
> > usable by cut&paste in .ly files, and it would be good to allow everyone to 
> > do this without restrictions.
> 
> Your point is better than mine.
> 
> So, manual authors, any problem if some manual snippets and fragments of
> text pass into the public domain? I think that this is legally different

Please go ahead.

> BTW: Hurray for Yuval Harel who officially added the first externally
> contributed snippet 8^).

Cool!

-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen