Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme

[Graham Percival]

On 11-May-06, at 6:59 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote:

> On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Graham Percival wrote:
> >  From 11.1.2 Internal music representation
> > ----
> > C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For
> > technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by
> > different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while
> > \grace creates a Grace_music object.
> >
> > We expect that distinctions between different C++ types will disappear
> > in the future.
> > ----
> >
> > IIRC, a few years ago we replaced a bunch of C++ things with scheme.  
> > I
> > also doubt that anybody's looked at this chapter in the past few 
> > years.
> >   Is this data still correct?
>
> No, there's only one Music class now (it changed somewhere in 2.7.x).

Err... ok.  So is this correct and/or sufficiently explained?

----
@item
C++ object: Each music object is represented by the Music
class C++ object.
----


- Graham