Re: command index vs. unified index

[Mats Bengtsson]

I actually like having a single index which includes the
commands. However, I don't like the current title of the
index (I know it's not called "Index" for silly technical reasons),
it seems that many people miss that it's actually there.

  /Mats

Graham Percival wrote:

> I've been investigating producing an index of commands, but it appears 
> that texinfo can only use each @findex once -- if I have an index of 
> @findex entries, then those entries won't appear in the general index 
> (despite my using @syncodeindex).  I've asked for help on the texinfo 
> help list,
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-texinfo/2006-05/msg00000.html
>
> If it's impossible to use the same @findex entries twice, should we 
> keep our single unified index, or should we split the \commands off 
> into their own index?
>
> - Graham
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel



--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
       Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================