Re: command index vs. unified index

[Graham Percival]

I've finally managed to get them playing nicely together.  Commands 
should be indexed with
@funindex \relative
no @code{} is required.  General concepts continue to be indexed with
@cindex Concept, general

I'm not certain if the command index will be particularly useful, but 
it's there now and doesn't interfere with the general index.

Cheers,
- Graham

On 19-May-06, at 11:46 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:

> I actually like having a single index which includes the
> commands. However, I don't like the current title of the
> index (I know it's not called "Index" for silly technical reasons),
> it seems that many people miss that it's actually there.
>
>   /Mats
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > I've been investigating producing an index of commands, but it 
> > appears that texinfo can only use each @findex once -- if I have an 
> > index of @findex entries, then those entries won't appear in the 
> > general index (despite my using @syncodeindex).  I've asked for help 
> > on the texinfo help list,
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-texinfo/2006-05/msg00000.html
> >
> > If it's impossible to use the same @findex entries twice, should we 
> > keep our single unified index, or should we split the \commands off 
> > into their own index?
> >
> > - Graham
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
>
>
> --
> =============================================
>         Mats Bengtsson
>         Signal Processing
>         Signals, Sensors and Systems
>         Royal Institute of Technology
>         SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
>         Sweden
>         Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
>        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
>         Email: address@hidden
>         WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
> =============================================