[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snippet authorship
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: snippet authorship |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:39:42 +0200 |
2008/4/24 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > Yes, but that way the author's name won't be displayed at all (even
> > the comment will be stripped out).
>
> Umm, yes. That is exactly the point.
In this case, why on earth would you like the authors to sign their
snippets *at all*?
> We have a THANKS file for a reason -- adding attributions to every
> single contribution is unweildly.
If this is a matter of THANKS, then we should just use the LSR user
accounts to have a list of contributors.
> > I don't have any solution, but it's a pity that we always have to
> > print either the *whole* code verbatim or no code at all.
>
> Not a pity at all. We /want/ to show the whole file.
I get your point, but aren't there some examples in the documentation
where we have to add not-directly-relevant commands to make the
examples clearer? e;g. adding some breaks, some alignment rules or
whatever?
Cheers,
Valentin