[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backslashes in escape rules
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: backslashes in escape rules |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jul 2008 02:05:56 -0700 |
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:51:36 +0200
John Mandereau <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2008/07/04 17:38 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Which should I use? "foo", "\\foo", or "\\\\foo" ?
>
> I guess the motivation for using "foo" iso. "\\\\foo" for regexp
> substitution is making docs updating easier, as running text or
> comments sometimes mention the command name without the backslash.
That should never happen. If people use commands in the running
text at all -- which they're supposed to avoid if at all possible
-- then they should *definitely* use "\foo".
Cheers,
- Graham
- backslashes in escape rules, Graham Percival, 2008/07/04
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, John Mandereau, 2008/07/05
- Re: backslashes in escape rules,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, John Mandereau, 2008/07/05
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/07/05
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, John Mandereau, 2008/07/05
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/07/06
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, John Mandereau, 2008/07/07
- Re: backslashes in escape rules, Graham Percival, 2008/07/05