Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Re: Octavation syntax consistency

[John Mandereau]

On 2008/07/24 13:49 -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Hello Han-Wen,
> > Do you have any opinion about this patch (adds \ottava #x, which is
> > supposed
> > to make #(set-octavation x) obsolete)? Okay to apply to master?
> 
> Shouldn't that really be \octave #x since other commands are in English?

\ottava produces *ottava brackets* in the output, so this perfectly
makes sense, and \ottava is shorter to type, isn't it Valentin ;-) ?

These are my 2 cents, nothing else.  I generally don't care so much
about command names, so I will no longer argue for this particular
command.

Maybe set-octavation declaration as public scm function should be
scraped BTW.

Cheers,
John

PS: I'm not at home from tomorrow to Friday, I will daily look for an
Internet connection, but I'm afraid I'll not be more available as I've
been recently (long replying delay, very few commits to Git) :-/