[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for stylesheets
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: Patch for stylesheets |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:37:30 +0200 |
2008/10/3 Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
>> I'm simply suggesting that we should use (or there should be a)
>> Texi2XHMTL rather than Texi2HTML.
>
> Ahh, this is something *completely* different :-) XHTML is fine -- the
> closing tags (not necessary in HTML) are good for humans too, but XML
> is normally far too verbose.
In the handcoded pages (we have plenty) I vote to go towards XHTML.
Reason: good for humans. Another reason: we are nearly there, we have
begun closing <p> and <li> and even <br /> which BTW gives a warning
at the w3c validator. <img /> and maybe a few others still left.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, (continued)
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Francisco Vila, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Eyolf Ă˜strem, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, John Mandereau, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/10/02
- Re: Patch for stylesheets,
Francisco Vila <=