[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \bigger and \larger: that's one too many
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: \bigger and \larger: that's one too many |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:42:54 +0200 |
2008/10/9 Dan Eble <address@hidden>:
> Moreover, if \bigger is cast out for being colloquial, how does teeny get a
> free pass?
Because it's cute? :-)
> But seriously, assuming one can remember the set of choices without
> consulting the manual, how can one remember which of \teeny or \tiny is
> smaller? (The Wiktionary editors consider them synonyms.)
Don't know. As a non-English speaker, I learned about the "teeny" word
only by reading and translating LilyPond's doc.
> Wouldn't it be better to reduce the number of preset sizes by nixing \teeny
> too? Users who really need shorthand for \teeny, \hardlyLegible, or
> \invisibleToTheNakedEye can define their own functions, after all.
That would be a compatibility break. Unless we have a convert-rule that turns
\teeny
into
\tiny \small
but replacing one command with two commands is rarely the way to go...
Cheers,
Valentin