[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilybuntu confusion
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: lilybuntu confusion |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:02:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:41:32PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:50:07PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Does this still compile the lilypond examples? That would take
>> take much longer than 10-30 seconds.
>
> I'm able to copy to different location and compile certain files by
> themselves as long as they don't require a bunch of @include files. They
> compile very quickly this way. I wonder if it might help to define some
> new Make targets. For example "make lilypond-learning.pdf" would only
> compile the LM, and I would assume save quite a bit of time in compiling
> over "make doc".
I was already planning on splitting the docs into
Documentation/learning, Documentation/notation, etc., so that
would implicitly do this anyway. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, (continued)
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Mark Polesky, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, ArnoWaschk, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/01
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/02
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/03
- Re: lilybuntu confusion,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/07/03
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Graham Percival, 2009/07/03
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/03
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/03
- Re: lilybuntu confusion, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/07/01