[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New format for autobeaming rules
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: New format for autobeaming rules |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:30:32 +0100 |
2009/7/15 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> I'm not sure I understand why you think it should it be in input/new instead
> of just being in the docs. It doesn't use \set or \override. It explains
> the use of a LilyPond command. That's why I thought it should be an inline
> snippet.
It's positioned in the middle of a @snippet block, so it looks like a
snippet waiting to be moved to LSR.
Regards,
Neil
- New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/12
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/14
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Graham Percival, 2009/07/17
- PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/15
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, joeneeman, 2009/07/21
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl . D . Sorensen, 2009/07/22
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, joeneeman, 2009/07/22