[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New format for autobeaming rules
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: New format for autobeaming rules |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:03:17 -0600 |
On 7/15/09 3:45 PM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/2005/3086
> File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/2005/3086#newcode519
> Line 519: (make-simultaneous-music output)
> This breaks all the Festival regression tests which use \time
> (song-associated-voice.ly, song-basic.ly, song-breathe.ly,
> song-melisma.ly, song-stanzas.ly & song-tempo.ly):
>
> /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.13.4/scm/song.scm:707:52: In procedure last
> in expression (last lst-1):
> /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.13.4/scm/song.scm:707:52: Wrong type
> argument in position 1 (expecting pair): ()
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88155
Aargh -- I thought I had run the regtests after that change, but apparently
not.
I've got that fixed now, and the regtests run without error.
Thanks for saving my bacon,
Carl
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, (continued)
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/14
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Neil Puttock, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Graham Percival, 2009/07/17
- PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules,
Carl Sorensen <=
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, joeneeman, 2009/07/21
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl . D . Sorensen, 2009/07/22
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, joeneeman, 2009/07/22
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/22