[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal for doc+web sources
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: proposal for doc+web sources |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:17:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> Another point is that, as far as I can see, we're ready to happily
> break any existing links to the former documentation, as well as URLs
> we've been using for years such as lily.org/web/install... and it's a
> bit frightening to imagine that any website or mail that has been
> linking to a specific page in the last decade will suddenly cease to
> work. Or am I the only one concerned?
You're the only one concerned, because everybody else knows that
redirects are done in web/lilypond.org.htaccess, and adding more
redirects is only a git push away.
If anybody was silly enough to link to a specific documentation
page, then we probably broke that during GDP anyway.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: proposal for doc+web sources, (continued)
- Re: proposal for doc+web sources, Valentin Villenave, 2009/07/16
- Re: proposal for doc+web sources,
Graham Percival <=
Re: proposal for doc+web sources, John Mandereau, 2009/07/18