[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T]
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T] |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:02:26 +0100 (CET) |
> Would it be feasible to create new listeners/performers/contexts
> purely in Scheme, by having generic enough C++
> listener/performer/context factories that one can fit in everything
> worth having by using Scheme?
Well, there are ongoing efforts to move more functionality from C++ to
Scheme (maybe `ongoing efforts' is an euphemism)... Additionally, the
forthcoming version 2.0 of Guile features a compiler – hopefully,
LilyPond will be able to make use of it so that it runs faster. If
this is indeed the case it makes sense to move even more stuff from
C++ to Scheme.
Werner
- Re: developers developers developers, (continued)
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Graham Percival, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, David Kastrup, 2009/11/13
- Re: developers developers developers, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, Francisco Vila, 2009/11/12
- Re: developers developers developers, demery, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], David Kastrup, 2009/11/12
- Re: Quit [now definitely O/T],
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Message not available
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Chris Snyder, 2009/11/12
Re: Quit [now definitely O/T], Frédéric Bron, 2009/11/12