[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code review/discussion time again.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Code review/discussion time again. |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:55:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the
> \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me
> just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is
> actually _supposed_ to be mangling them?
Well, given my apparent discrepance between coding and social
interaction skills, the resulting dearth of actually useful advice and
other things (recently a patch of mine was rejected that actually would
have brought some oversights in line with the rest), I think that it
might be the smoothest course of action if I just had commit access
myself. Unfortunately, Lilypond does not readily lend itself to
extension just in source files, so some of the functionality I need
implemented needs to be put into the source, and it would be a pity if
it was not generally available.
I think I would like some more modularization; it does not make much
sense that everybody has harp pedal functionality loaded by default. Or
accordion functionality. But at the moment I don't feel fit for
rearchitecturing, it will be enough work to extend Lilypond in style for
my purposes.
--
David Kastrup
- Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/19
- Re: Code review/discussion time again.,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Carl Sorensen, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/11/22
- Re: Code review/discussion time again., David Kastrup, 2009/11/23
Re: Code review/discussion time again., Graham Percival, 2009/11/21